Democracy and Executive Power: Administrative Policymaking in Comparative Perspective
نویسندگان
چکیده
This essay on executive rulemaking procedures in the US, UK, France, and Germany examines how administrative constitutional law interact when makes policy under delegated authority. Given their differing structures legal frameworks, political incentives for policymaking accountability differ. The US is a separation-of-powers presidential system. UK are parliamentary systems with without written constitutions. common underpins UK’s unwritten constitution. France has strong president relatively weak parliament. separation of powers generated statutory requirements notice-and-comment rulemaking. legislatures German have little incentive to enact such constraints own cabinets. French system lacks required as well. However, even if suggest that sitting politicians will interest reform, need greater public remains. essay, drawing author’s recent book Democracy power, describes these cross-country differences argues ways produce more democratically responsible policymaking. Those concerned about future representative democracy should include reform list priorities. Structural issues linked openness regulatory bodies cabinet departments not be ignored heat day-to-day crises soak up headlines.
منابع مشابه
The Choices for Scandinavian Social Democracy in Comparative Perspective
Scandinavian social democracy represents one of the most systematic attempts to shape economic institutions and policies in pursuit of equality and full employment. Increasingly, however, these goals have eluded governments, and their institutional supports have eroded. This paper seeks to understand this shift through a comparative analysis that places particular emphasis on the interaction be...
متن کاملThe Middle East's Democracy Deficit in Comparative Perspective
Th e Middle East’s democracy deficit is a product of the patterns of political and economic development in the region. It is not because the region is predominantly Islamic or is somehow afflicted by purportedly undemocratic cultures. By itself, culture is not an impediment to transition to democracy as it is subject to influences from the larger polity, especially insofar as the economy and th...
متن کاملDirect Democracy and the Executive Branch
This paper examines the impact of direct democracy on the executive branch. Direct democracy is a mixed blessing for the executive in theory: it weakens the legislature by cutting it out of the lawmaking process, but also allows new laws to avoid the governor’s veto. Empirically, the constitutional initiative is associated with several changes in the organization of the executive branch, includ...
متن کاملHow the Public Views Democracy and its Competitors in East Asia: Taiwan in Comparative Perspective. Taiwan Democracy Project, CDDRL
On May 25-26, the Taiwan Democracy Project (with support from the Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in San Francisco) held its seventh annual conference entitled "How the Public Views Democracy and its Competitors in East Asia: Taiwan in Comparative Perspective.” The conference, cosponsored by the Program for East Asia Democratic Studies at National Taiwan University, brought together leading...
متن کاملexecutive compensation and firm performance: shareholders perspective
this study addresses executive compensation from shareholders perspective by empirically examining the effects of chief executive officer (ceo) compensation on firm performance subsequent to the year of compensation. three factors of ceo compensation are examined, size, total annual compensation; form percentage of total compensation comprised of cash, cash bonuses and stock; and sensitivity. t...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Revista de derecho pu?blico
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['2695-7191']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37417/rpd/vol_6_2022_978